Cleo Juan sentence was
it fair?
By Bill Donovan GALLUP District Attorney Karl Gillson is hoping that the recent decision in the Cleo Juan child abuse case sends a warning to parents and foster parents to be careful how they treat their children. This comes as a time, said Gillson, when his office
is handling the highest number of child abuse cases leading to death
since at least 1991 when he became involved in the office. The office
is handling at least three major child abuse cases, all set to come
to trial within the next few months. While the sentencing is over, the court case will
continue. Fine contends this was meant for someone whose actions over a long period of time causes a childs death, but Gillson said he thought that the Legislature was trying to protect children from abusive families, whether the death was a result of one incident or several. In any case, he said, during the Juan trial, officials for the state medical examiners office testified that they found evidence of trauma to the childs brain that occurred a week before his death. He said while there is no way to determine who was responsible for the earlier injury, it does show a pattern of abuse. Mark Fine, Juans other attorney, has been trying since the conviction to find a way to reduce her sentence, arguing that the judge in this case should have allowed the jury to consider a lesser charge of just child abuse, which would have severely reduced her sentence. This stems from statements made by Juan to police that on the day of he childs death, she had yanked his pajamas off, causing him to fall. Although that didnt cause the head trauma that caused his death, he felt the jury had the right to show leniency and find her guilty of that abuse and not the one that of which she was convicted. District Judge Grant Foutz rejected this request both during the trial and after. Jim Bierly, the chief prosecutor in this case, has argued that Fines request doesnt make a lot of sense and compared it to a situation where someone committed a bank robbery for example and then fled the area. Then some 30 miles away, he goes into a convenience store and steals a candy bar. Under Fines theory, a jury would be allowed to convict the guy of just stealing a candy bar and ignore the bank robbery. The fact that Juan admitted to police a case of minor child abuse doesnt allow a jury to ignore the one that caused his death, he said. These are two separate incidents. In his sentencing brief to the district court, Mark Fine talked a lot about Juans personal tragedies. Cleos life has been comprised of a sequence of life-shattering catastrophes, including the violent deaths of her father, sister and daughter. The misery that Cleo has endured defies comprehension and calls into question the theory of an ordered life, he wrote. Depending on whether one agrees with the jurys verdict in this case, Colbys death represents either Ms. Juans violent loss of control as a result of the stress and depression caused by her tragic history or another horrible tragedy for which she is not responsible. In either case, her history of unimaginable suffering warrants consideration when fashioning a sentence. Joe Fine said he viewed Foutz as sympathetic to Juan but unable to do anything because of state laws. But in the end Foutz did what he was required to do by state law and gave her a life sentence. My hands are tied on this issue, he said during the sentencing. |
Thursday Cleo Juan sentence was it fair? Ramah man gets 3 years for killing Living near the
Homestake Native American
Section |
| Home | Daily News | Archive | Subscribe | All contents property of the
Gallup Independent.
Any duplication or republication requires consent of the Gallup Independent. Please send the Gallup Independent feedback on this website and the paper in general. Send questions or comments to ga11p1nd@cnetco.com |