New Mexico wants to intervene By Kathy Helms WINDOW ROCK The state of New Mexico has filed a motion to
intervene in a proposed consent decree requiring U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency to act on an air permit application for the Desert
Rock power plant. Desert Rock Energy Co. LLC and Diné Power Authority filed
a complaint March 18 seeking injunctive relief to compel EPA to
act on their pending application for a Clean Air Act Prevention
of Significant Deterioration permit. They must obtain the permit in order to construct the proposed
1,500 megawatt coal-fired Desert Rock power plant to be built on
the Navajo Reservation near Farmington. Today is the deadline for
comment on the consent decree. The issue will be decided by July
31. In the motion filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Houston,
New Mexico Attorney General Gary K. King said the July 31 deadline
on the proposed consent decree precludes EPA from satisfying crucial
requirements in the permitting process. New Mexico must intervene now because the existing parties
to this action have made it abundantly clear, in a proposed consent
decree lodged recently with this court, that they will not comply
with statutory requirements in the permitting process. It requires EPA to act contrary to law without
fulfilling its legal obligation under the Endangered Species Act
to complete a formal consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service,
King said, adding that the deadline also means EPA will act without
having considered controls on emissions of carbon dioxide or fine
particulate matter. Frank Maisano, spokesperson for Sithe Global Power LLC, developer
of the Desert Rock project along with DPA, said the lawsuit is only
about the timing of issuing the permit. EPA has a Clean Air Act statutory requirement to issue a
permit decision 12 months after it receives an accepted permit application.
That was May of 2004. They are over three years late in issuing
a decision. It has nothing to do with any of the items General King lists
in his request for intervention. You cant say that this permit
ought to be stopped because we havent had a meeting about
endangered species yet, because that has nothing to do with the
air permit. Nathan Plagens, director of Project Development for Sithe, said
the company feels that Desert Rock and EPA have fulfilled all their
obligations and performed the necessary evaluations to issue the
permit. We have met with the governors office several times.
I guess were disappointed that the governors office
still fails to listen to us, hear us out, believe what we tell them,
and support the Navajo Nation in their economic development affairs. King said New Mexico has made concerted efforts to reduce statewide
greenhouse gas emissions, all of which would be undone by
the more than 10 million tons per year of carbon dioxide that Desert
Rock will emit. The proposed deadline requires EPA to overlook legal and practical
considerations by taking final action without having evaluated Desert
Rocks emissions of hazardous air pollutants like mercury and
ozone precursors, he said. Nearly every single major reservoir in New Mexico is already
under a fish consumption advisory because of elevated mercury levels. Under the new federal ozone standard, New Mexico is on the
brink of non-attainment for ozone in the very region in which Desert
Rock is proposed, King added. The motion states that though plaintiffs allege they submitted
a completed PSD permit application on May 21, 2004, and that EPA
was obligated to take action no later than May 31, 2005, he said
they may not have standing to bring the suit. The original application was filed by Steag Power LLC, and the state has not located any evidence in the administrative record showing that the plaintiffs have been substituted as the permit applicant, he said. |
Weekend New Mexico wants to intervene |
| Home | Daily News | Archive | Subscribe | All contents property of the
Gallup Independent.
Any duplication or republication requires consent of the Gallup Independent. Please send the Gallup Independent feedback on this website and the paper in general. Send questions or comments to ga11p1nd@cnetco.com |