Council refuses to hear politicos
By John Christian Hopkins
Diné Bureau
WINDOW ROCK Navajo Nation delegates voted Monday not to
listen to three-minute oral presentations from two congressional
candidates during the first day of the summer session.
Democratic candidates for Congressional District 1 TV personality
Mary Kim Titla and attorney Howard Shanker attended the opening
day, hoping to introduce themselves to the council.
In addition to being a member of The Shanker Law Firm, Shanker is
an adjunct professor at the Arizona State University College of
Law, where he teaches courses in environmental litigation and environmental
justice.
Shanker also recently completed a three-year term on the U.S. EPA's
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council, Enforcement Subcommittee.
Titla was hired as a newsroom receptionist at televisioin station
KTVK in Phoenix. She had planned on becoming a print journalist,
but, there were no job openings in print in the Phoenix area.
Within two years, Titla worked her way up the trenches to become
a production assistant and, in 1987, she became the first Native
American TV reporter in Arizona, with television station KVOA in
Tucson. Titla worked at KVOA for 6 years, until television station
KPNX hired her away in 1993. She worked there until resigning in
late 2005 to publish Native Youth Magazine, which she founded.
Across the country, tribal nations often complain that they are
ignored by politicians this time, the tables were turned as the
Navajo delegates decided to ignore the candidates.
"We have Renzi," one delegate muttered, referring to incumbent
U.S. Rep. Rick Renzi.
But with possible ethical lapses hovering in the shadows, there
is a chance that Renzi could be forced from office. Limitations
were already put in place regarding Renzi's committee assignments.
Delegate Ervin M. Keeswood Sr. attempted to amend the session's
agenda to allow Shanker and Titla a chance to speak, but by a 30-40
vote delegates thumbed their noses at the candidates.
Shortly thereafter, Delegate Willie Begay motioned to put Shanker
on the agenda, saying it would be to discuss the San Francisco Peaks
suit. Shanker represented the Nation in a victorious suit.
That move was a "blatantly political" attempt for one
delegate to get the candidate he prefers on the agenda, while leaving
Titla off, Keeswood charged.
In fairness, either both candidates or neither should be put on
the agenda, Keeswood said.
"This has nothing to do with politics," Begay defended.
"It's to update us about the San Francisco Peaks."
Council rejected Begay's amendment by a 28-47 count.
|
Tuesday
July 17, 2007
Selected
Stories:
School board
follows the law; Candidate withdraws name; Jackson tells board to
obey the law
Council
refuses to hear politicos
Rally
to roar into Grants this weekend; Fire and Ice Bike Rally named
among top biker events
Sound of drums;
Downtown Indian dances inform, entertain crowd
Deaths
|