'If only we'd known'
South Texas residents tell opponents to keep
fighting
Protestors make their way along the road toward a proposed mining
site in Crownpoint April 24. Hydro Resources Incorporated received
a license to mine at the site west of town, but still must go through
several reviews, including input from concerned citizens, before
the work can begin. The protestors shouted slogans like "Water is
life!", "Respect our land!" and "HRI go home!". [Photo by Brian
Leddy/Independent]
By Zsombor Peter
Staff Writer
Uranium timeline
Late 1970s - early 1980s: Several companies, including
Conoco and Mobile, explore uranium resources around Crownpoint
1986: HRI buys land around Crownpoint
1988: HRI files for mining license with NRC
2006: NRC grants final OK
2007: ENDAUM appeals NRC decision to 10th Circuit
Court of Appeals; mining has yet to begin
|
GALLUP The Eastern Navajo Diné Against Uranium Mining
aren't the only ones who want the uranium mining company Hydro Resources
Inc. out of their community.
Almost 1,000 miles away in Kingsville, Texas, a half-hour's drive
inland from the Gulf Coast, some of the locals who've already leased
their land to the company want the same thing. Only in Kingsville,
Uranium Resources Inc., HRI's parent company, has been mining uranium
for almost two decades.
A group of lessors calling itself STOP, for South Texas Opposes
Pollution, blames URI for permanently contaminating its land. It
accuses the company of making false promises and breaking a restoration
contract it made with the county. The company denies the charges.
But when STOP member Elizabeth Cumberland heard about ENDAUM's plans
to picket HRI's Crownpoint office last Tuesday, she got hold of
a few other members and sent off a letter of support, urging residents
here not to make the mistake they did.
"If I could, I would prevent them from signing the lease and
getting in this position," she said. "You'll never get
your land back. You'll never get your water back. You'll never be
able to sell it."
Breach of contract?
STOP complains about the explosions and numerous spills on state
record since URI started operations at its Kingsville Dome site
in 1988. But what troubles the group most is what both STOP and
Kleberg County are calling a breach of contract.
In 2004 the county and company agreed that any wells in Areas 1
and 2 that were suitable for drinking, irrigation or stock watering
before mining started would be restored to pre-mining conditions
before mining could start in Area 3. When they signed the deal,
said George Rice, a groundwater hydrologist working for STOP, the
county didn't have its own experts. So it relied on the tests URI
conducted in 1985, which indicated that one of the wells, I-11,
qualified. Although URI has yet to fully restore even that one well,
it started mining Area 3 earlier this year.
URI, said Rice, "basically said 'Forget you, county. We're
going to go ahead mining, and if you don't like it that's too bad.'
"
The county, in turn, passed a resolution Feb. 12 calling for mediation
with URI and authorizing litigation if necessary. Lowerre &
Frederick attorney Eric Allmon said the parties were still mediating.
URI doesn't believe it's breached anything. After itsigned the deal
with the county, the company found a second test from 1987, still
before mining ever began, indicating that even I-11 didn't qualify.
But STOP's worries go beyond I-11. In a mass-mailing form letter
Rice recently prepared urging state senators not to vote for a bill
the group is opposing in the Texas Legislature, he claims that uranium
concentrations at Kingsville Dome remain as much as 400 percent
above premining conditions and that nearby domestic wells are in
danger.
URI says the elevated uranium levels have nothing to do with its
mining and that the water at the site was unsuitable for human use
to begin with. As for the domestic wells nearby, Mark Pelizza, the
company's vice president of environmental affairs, insists there's
nothing to worry about.
To get at the site's uranium, URI pumps chemicals into the ground
to loosen the mineral from the underground rock and brings the mixture
to the surface for processing. It's called in situ leach mining
and it's been around for 30 years. In all that time, Pelizza said,
"there has never been a water well impacted."
HRI plans to use the same technique to get at the 25 million pounds
of uranium officials say the company has claims to in northwest
New Mexico, at two sites in Crownpoint and one near Church Rock.
To lease or not to lease
Despite ENDAUM's protests, some Crownpoint lessors are eager for
HRI to get started. According to HRI, the nine people leasing land
at just one of its Crownpoint sites could stand to earn as much
as $1.1 million. Besides that, the lessors are urging opponents
to consider the jobs uranium mining to could bring to Crownpoint,
up to 100 according to company figures.
Teo Saens heard the same promises when he leased 40 acres of his
Kleberg County land to URI in the early 1990s and regrets believing
them.
"The words that were used were, 'We're going to take a batch
of uranium and leave (the water) crystal clear,' " Saens said,
cleaner even, the company added, than it had found it.
His lease has since expired. Because URI never mined the 40 acres,
Saens said, he earned only $100 a year per acre. But he considers
even that modest sum nothing short of "blood money."
"It's little consolation for what they're doing to the land,"
said Saens. "If we knew what we know today, we wouldn't have
leased."
Incidentally, the same day ENDAUM was marching on HRI's Crownpoint
office, STOP members were in Austin, Texas, urging their state legislators
not to vote for a bill they say would eliminate public hearing from
the process of evaluating new mining units proposals inside of a
permitted area. Pelizza said the bill would actually strengthen
the public's hand by requiring permits now granted for unrestricted
terms to sunset.
But Cumberland sees more of a connection between Kingsville and
Crownpoint than a common foe.
Because HRI has yet to start mining in northwest New Mexico, it's
invested in land that's yet to turn a profit. So Cumberland can
only assume the company is covering its New Mexico bills with its
Texas earnings.
"It's mining from our land that's helping them mine on their
land," she said.
The letter Cumberland sent ENDAUM was one thing. But ENDAUM hopes
the group can send some members here to share their experiences
with locals in person. If she hadn't been tied up in Austin, Cumberland
said she might have even joined last week's march.
|
Tuesday
May 1, 2007
Selected
Stories:
'If
only we'd known'; South Texas residents tell opponents to keep fighting
Navajo-Gallup
water project cost rising to over $716M
New nurse comes
to Grants
Man found
living in missing woman's home
Deaths
|