Council eyes legal action over NIIP By Kathy Helms WINDOW ROCK The Navajo Nation
Council has been asked to consider taking legal action against the
federal government to get it to follow through on completion of
the Navajo Indian Irrigation Project. NIIP was enacted by Congress in 1962 under former
President John F. Kennedys administration and was designed
to provide a water delivery system from Navajo Dam reservoir to
irrigate 110,630 acres of Navajo land. The statute includes an annual
diversion right of 508,000 acre feet of water for irrigation. That was to trade water into the Rio Grande,
said Tsosie Lewis, NAPI general manager. The San Juan Chama Diversion
project was completed in the early 1970s, so the people in
the Rio Grande are enjoying what the Navajo Nation gave up in exchange
for 110,640 acres. In 1970, the Navajo Agricultural Products Industry,
a high-tech farming enterprise, was created by Council to provide
employment opportunities for the Navajo people. NAPI began as a
model high-tech farming operation, using automated-control center
pivot systems and state-of-the-art drop nozzle sprinkler heads to
efficiently manage its water resources. The Bureau of Indian Affairs, the principal party
charged with building out NIIP, hired the Bureau of Reclamation
to build the infrastructure the canal system, pumping plants,
and delivery units, Tsosie said. There were particular guidelines
for NIIP and a particular design that the Bureau of Reclamation
put together. In 2001, Neil McCaleb, assistant secretary of Indian
Affairs, wrote a letter to then-Navajo Nation President Kelsey Begaye,
asking that the agency be allowed to keep half the money that year
and use it somewhere else. The Bureau of Indian Affairs should be sitting
up here explaining to you why NIIP has not been finished. They have
really taken a back seat to full funding, and they have really not
been straightforward to us, he said. As a result, NAPI is
working on a loan from Wells Fargo Bank to fund repairs. Delegate Amos Johnson said, It really isnt
fair for the Navajo Nation to make that sacrifice to get water into
the Rio Grande Valley. ... I believe the boards recommendation
to sue the Bureau or whoever, is appropriate. Its been dragging
on for so long. George Arthur, chairman of the Resources Committee,
said NIIP was discussed during talks on the New Mexico portion of
the San Juan River Water Rights Settlement, and Council took the
water portion of NIIP development out of the settlement. Council and the Navajo leadership need to determine
how to proceed with addressing the lack of funding and lack of completion
of the project, he said. Right now, we are being asked to
file a lawsuit. I think we have to analyze this to some extent because
we do have a pending legislation on the water rights settlement. We dont know what the makeup of the leadership
is going to be in the next few months and we need to make certain
that all of our cards are in order and that the representatives
at the congressional level are in alliance with our desires. Basically it goes back to what the federal government
always does to us not fulfilling its obligation, Simpson
said. Were being pushed aside again. *Ervin Keeswood said the discussion on NIIP is long
overdue. The Navajo Nation has really been treated unjustly
throughout the years. It was supposed to be 10 years for both projects
to be completed the Chama Diversion and NIIP. The Chama was completed in those 10 years, and
our brothers and sisters of the Caucasian persuasion are enjoying
our Navajo water in Albuquerque while our people are doing without.
Budget and Finance Committee Chairman LoRenzo Bates
cautioned delegates. We have a water settlement going through
right now, and you heard from Mr. Lewis that theyre only farming
a certain number of acres. With all the excuses that the federal government
is putting forth, they could also use that as an excuse when the
water settlement comes through. You have a farm and youre
not farming the total available acreage, so were going to
take some of that water back. So it does have some possible
consequences. Lawrence Platero said there has been talk through the years about Nation signing a new MOA. I think thats a bad thing to do, to sign into a new MOA when they cant even be in compliance with the first MOA. I urge your support in trying to get the lawsuit developed and lets try to get completion of the project. |
Weekend Spark of conflict
UNM-Gallup class features area history County plunging into bond market for new building Council eyes legal action over NIIP Spiritual Perspectives |
| Home | Daily News | Archive | Subscribe | All contents property of the
Gallup Independent.
Any duplication or republication requires consent of the Gallup Independent. Please send the Gallup Independent feedback on this website and the paper in general. Send questions or comments to ga11p1nd@cnetco.com |