Traditional Impact Copyright © 2008 LAGUNA Like many landowners in and around the boundaries of state and federal traditional cultural property designations, James Martinez feels the state and federal government are placing a greater importance on Native American religions than his own heritage. Martinez is on the board of the Cebolleta Land Grant, which holds some 4,500 acres around the town of Marquez. The land has been in his familys possession since the 1700s. Native American Tribes, including the Navajo Nation and Pueblo of Acoma, are pushing to have temporary traditional cultural property designations made permanent. Even though their current listing is temporary, landowners are still held to the traditional cultural property regulations, which require any state or federal permits to go through the tribes before approval. This means that, in and around the traditional cultural property boundaries, any private or commercial activity will face delays that can last months or even years, depending on any concerns raised by the tribes. This even applies to private landowners trying to prosper off their land. Weve lived here since the 1700s, and we never heard of no traditional cultural property, Martinez says. Martinezs great, great grandfather was among the first homesteaders
on the land. They left paintings of Catholic saints on the walls
of caves around the area. As Martinez points out, most of the area
names are Spanish. The traditional cultural property includes some 200,000 acres of land within its boundaries, but regulations apply to land around the boundaries as well. The state and Forest Service never made any attempt to notify or consult with landowners before making the temporary designations. The tribes requested them after uranium companies began seeking permits to do exploratory drilling to update old data. Like most landowners, Martinez only learned about it after the fact. The designation was made early this year, but the attorney general threw out the decision after it was determined the Cultural Properties Review Committee had not properly publicized the meeting that made the designation, which violated the states Open Meetings Act. The committee had another meeting last June, which some 700 people attended. Martinez says that despite the many landowners who spoke out against the designation, the whole meeting was a sham. The committee showed little interest in hearing any other side of the issue and rubber-stamped the traditional cultural property designation. The committee had already decided, Martinez says. I respect everybodys religion, but this is important to me too. For years, the Martinez family has been leasing the land to uranium mining companies, who want to mine and mill uranium on the Martinezs land. Its uncertain just how much the traditional cultural property designation will delay or if it will stop the family from proceeding with their plans. But Patricia Martinez, Jamess wife, says that the companies have been very good to her family and her, including giving her children college scholarships. Id welcome them with open arms, she says. She says they see their land as a way to prosper for their family and the community. The mining will bring jobs and incomes, she says. Most importantly, it can go back into the community of Marquez. James and Patricias hope is that the community will prosper and their children can come back and live there. We want the same opportunity (the Native Americans) have. We want our people to come back and prosper from the land ... Nobody gave me a say when they decided to build a casino, James Martinez says. |
Tuesday Pelotte leaving Gallup, Maikowski going to Page Women vets convention at UNM-G Thursday Land grant owners want say in Mount Taylor designation Massive turnout expected at polls Native American |
Independent
Web Edition 5-Day Archive:
|
||||
|
||||
| Home | Daily News | Archive | Subscribe | All contents property of the
Gallup Independent.
Any duplication or republication requires consent of the Gallup Independent. Please send the Gallup Independent feedback on this website and the paper in general. Send questions or comments to gallpind@cia-g.com |